“Striking elegance, economy, and argumentative power.”—Times Literary Supplement
“Marx did not reject the idea of a human nature. He was right not to do so.”
That is the conclusion of this passionate and polemical new work by Norman Geras. In it, he places the sixth of Marx’s Theses on Feuerbach under
rigorous scrutiny. He argues that this ambiguous statement—widely cited
as evidence that Marx broke with all conceptions of human nature in
1845—must be read in the context of Marx’s work as a whole. His later
writings are informed by an idea of a specifically human nature that
fulfills both explanatory and normative functions.
The belief that Marx’s historical materialism entailed a denial of the
conception of human nature is, Geras writes, “an old fixation, which the
Althusserian influence in this matter has fed upon … Because this
fixation still exists and is misguided, it is still necessary to
challenge it.” One hundred years after Marx’s death, this timely
essay—combining the strengths of analytical philosophy and classical
Marxism—rediscovers a central part of his heritage."